| · Portal |
Help
Search
Members
Calendar
|
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
| Pages: (2) 1 [2] ( Go to first unread post ) | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Nick the Pilot |
Posted: Jul 12 2009, 01:05 AM
|
![]() Administrator Group: Admin Posts: 2,612 Member No.: 1 Joined: 15-October 05 |
mensagitat,
I like to define Prakriti as "matter" and Mulaprakriti as "pre-matter." I also like Geoffrey Barborka's definition of Mulaprakriti as "pre-cosmic pre-matter." Pre-cosmic means "matter" that "exists" while universes appear and disappear (and exists continually during the time period between universes). To me, the appearance of Prakriti is the appearance of a new universe. There is one more problem with the terms Brahmâ and Brahma. A copy of the book The Secret Doctrine is online. http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/sd/sd-hp.htm Unfortunately, that copy of the SD has stripped away all diacritical marks, making every example of Brahmâ look like Brahma. This hopelessly confuses anyone who tries to read the online version of the SD. -------------------- There is a road, steep and thorny, beset with perils of every kind, but yet a road, and it leads to the very heart of the Universe. I can tell you how to find those who will show you the secret gateway that opens inwardly only, and closes fast behind the neophyte for evermore. H.P.Blavatsky
|
| mensagitat |
Posted: Jul 12 2009, 02:43 AM
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 346 Member No.: 541 Joined: 18-May 08 |
I wonder if Brahman, denoting neuter and masculine, mitigates the conceptual dissociation --I only wanted to try out that last phrase for fun, don't really know if it is appropriate to the context-- arriving out of the missing accent mark.
I'm suspecting male and female are terms relative to the manner in which we currently propagate. I really find myself at a loss to comprehensively describe Brahman. I suppose I would go on about the Circle which has no boundaries. Yet, Brahma is the sheath for Brahman. There is Brahma (Vach) and Brahma (Viraj), and Brahma possesses both Prakriti and Mulaprakriti, evolved and unevolved substance. Of course, Purusha and time are aspects as well. "Savoir Frere" is everywhere. I'm thinking bipolar forces with a dielectric aether is better than utilizing male and female as terms. Separate individual genders, according to Theosophy, began in the Third Root-Race and continues to... where/when? I am unsure on that. This does give me a strong indication that separate genders might be a relatively brief aspect within the Human Condition of experiencing/emanating/evolving/aspiring toward perfect harmony within the Spheres. Most of the above was my paraphrasing based upon the definition of Brahma found at the same site I provided a link-to in my previous post. -------------------- Per mare, per terras
|
Pages: (2) 1 [2] |
![]() ![]() ![]() |